COP29 Spotlight | Loss and Damage: At the forefront of climate impacts

“We need to pull together and scale up resources within and beyond the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, and ensure that these resources reach those most in need,” say CMCC experts in the buildup to COP29. Following the creation of the Loss and Damage Fund, economic and adaptation experts have focused on estimating the amount of financial resources needed to support vulnerable regions whilst promoting a just allocation that reflects the unequal distribution of climate impacts. After the official operationalization of the Fund and the first round of commitments, pledges have reached over 700 million USD in 2024.

Despite ongoing efforts to implement mitigation and adaptation policies, the need to address climate change residual risks is increasingly relevant in the face of escalating climate extremes. Loss and damage has gained momentum as the “third pillar” of climate action, beyond adaptation and mitigation. “When a climate event strikes, residual risks will materialize in losses and damages on the ground. Funding needs will be considerable in vulnerable developing countries and communities,” says Elisa Calliari, CMCC and IIASA researcher and member of the Italian delegation to COP29.

The nature of the Loss and Damage Fund is rooted in addressing these inequalities, building on three decades of historic advocacy by the Alliance of Small Islands States (AOSIS). “The Loss and Damage debate follows directly from the physics and economics of climate change, which creates long-lasting impacts, especially among the most vulnerable countries. In these parts of the world, the Loss and Damage Fund represents an important instrument to avoid permanent disruption,” comments Massimo Tavoni, Director of the European Institute on Economics and the Environment at CMCC. 

Setting the Fund in motion at COP29 

Following its official launch at COP27, questions about the contributors, beneficiaries and Fund governance were addressed during COP28 in Dubai. Parties agreed that eligibility for funding should extend to all developing countries, with a minimum percentage for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDSs). Since then, over 700 million USD has been pledged to the Fund.

Building on these first steps, the upcoming 29th annual meeting of the “COP is called to take stock of the work carried out by the Board of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage during the year and leading to the operationalization of the Fund as a World Bank hosted financial intermediary fund, the selection of the Philippines as the host country of the Board and the designation of Ibrahima Cheikh Diong as its first Executive Director, among other things. In this year’s session, the arrangements on the working relationship between the COP, the CMA and the Board of the Fund, will also be approved, says Calliari.

“In addition to these points on the agenda, COP29 will launch the first High-Level Dialogue on complementarity and coherence, as the key vehicle to bring together the wide range of actors forming the funding arrangements for responding to loss and damage and to identify priority gaps and enhance coherence, coordination and synergy in the funding landscape. Finally, the review of the Warsaw International Mechanism on Loss and Damage (WIM) in Baku will provide an opportunity to ensure coordination and synergy across the Loss and Damage support landscape, composed by the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage, the WIM Executive Committee and the Santiago Network,” continues Calliari. 

The quest to support impact quantification

The allocation of funding is highly complex, and methodologies for calculating damages are still a subject of debate among academics. Since the establishment of WIM in 2013, the field has grown significantly, with substantial contributions from social sciences and attribution studies, which are increasingly focusing on the socio-economic costs through the so-called extreme event impact attribution (EEIA). Nonetheless, according to Tavoni, “more science is still needed on the quantification of the economic and social impacts of climate change and the extent to which such risks are unavoidable,” bearing in mind the importance of establishing synergies with mitigation and adaptation research.

A recent study by CMCC offers new insight into the quantification of loss and damage costs by coupling climate economics with historic responsibility. The findings reaffirm the disproportionate impacts of unavoidable risk on most vulnerable countries, which bear the highest costs. This once again highlights the importance of integrating socio-economic costs and dynamic responsibility to appropriately allocate funding. As the upcoming negotiations – already referred to by international media as the “Finance COP” – are set to determine a New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) for climate finance, studies like this play a crucial role in assessing funding needs and arrangements. A data visualization tool with the results of the paper can be found here.

Read more:

Adelle Thomas: Putting the most vulnerable at the centre of COP27 – Foresight

Massimo Tavoni. “Science points to a loss and damage fund of several hundred billion USD” – Foresight  

Elisa Calliari: The vulnerability issue at the heart of the loss and damage fund

Those that lose out: Paying for the biggest cost of climate change – Foresight

Putting a number on Loss and Damage – CMCC

Understanding and quantifying the Loss and Damage policy space

Share

Risk-resilience-Igor-Linkov
Article

From risk to resilience

Resilience has shifted from being a matter of choice to an imperative. From climate disasters to failing infrastructure, the ability to withstand and recover from shocks is now at the heart of decision-making. Yet, despite its critical importance, there is still no universal definition for resilience and its relationship with risk. Dr Igor Linkov, a distinguished expert in risk prevention and management, walks us through methods for resilience quantification and how these can help transform fragmented approaches to risk management into coordinated strategies.

Article

Food: The story of climate change is written in our changing menus

Flavours of wine will be different, chocolate prices will rise, nutritional quality and yields of several crops will decline. Food offers unlimited stories to bring the perception of climate change closer to people, from the challenges facing our favourite foods to a different narration that highlights solutions and the value of science. A climate change and food scientist, a freelance writer, and a once-upon-a-time professional chef have put in place an effective mix of multiple modes of communication that can motivate people to join forces for climate action along the food supply chain.

China-climate-pledge
Article

China Pledges Climate Neutrality by 2060

In late September China announced its intention to become carbon neutral by 2060. This came as welcome news, particularly in light of the new stimulus measures for Covid recovery being deployed. However, even if China manages to abide by its commitments what will this mean for global climate objectives? Is it too little too late?