Biodiversity continues to decline

The value of ecosystem services is estimated at $125 trillion, just a few trillion less than the world’s total GDP, yet we are failing to protect and preserve the nature and biodiversity that support ecosystem functioning. According to the 2018 Living Planet Report, two of the biggest biodiversity hotspots – freshwater and tropical ecosystems, are in the most precarious situations. Over exploitation, climate change, and pollution are taking their toll on the species-rich habitats, and in turn populations of water-dwelling animals have declined by 83% on average.

Numbers in the biannual report are estimated using The Living Planet Index, which is a measure of the state of the world’s biological diversity based on population trends of vertebrate species from terrestrial, freshwater and marine habitats. A total of 4,005 species in 16,705 distinct populations are monitored across the globe. Data collected from 1970 to 2014 shows an overall decline of 60% in the population sizes of vertebrates, including mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians. Geographically, species population declines are especially pronounced in the tropics, with South and Central America suffering an 89% loss compared to 1970.

Despite worldwide recognition of the need for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, trends continue to decline. Moving away from a business as usual scenario will require several calculated steps: translating the aspirational vision to an ambitious goal, identifying ways to measure progress towards the goal, and identifying actions to deliver the required transformation in global biodiversity.

Read the WWF’s full report, LIVING PLANET REPORT 2018: Aiming higher.

Share

Interview

COP28 | MASSIMO TAVONI. “Science points to a loss and damage fund of several hundred billion USD”

The loss and damage fund has been established, and initial pledges have been made, but how much money should be directed into it and how should it be organized? Massimo Tavoni, director of the CMCC-RFF European Institute on Economics and the Environment, explains how climate-economic science and modeling can support the loss and damage debate. The latest evidence indicates that an adequate fund should be in the order of [140-822] USD billion and that it should differ from existing funding arrangements used for mitigation and adaptation.

Article

Moving mining back to Europe

EU clean energy targets will need 35 times more lithium and seven to 26 times the amount of rare earth metals in 2050 compared with today. Critical raw materials are a key ingredient in any green transition, but now the question is: can mining go hand in hand with nature protection laws?

Article

The Green Climate Fund Must Focus on Adaptation  

Historically adaptation projects have received less funding than ones for mitigation. Furthermore, the burden of implementing adaptation is falling ever more on the public sector, whereas for mitigation private sector interest and investments are on the rise. This is leading to consequences in how climate finance allocates resources which are failing to support at risk areas and Least Developed Countries. The Green Climate Fund aims to bridge this funding gap and has secured its second round of funding, this time obtaining 9.78 billion USD in pledges.